ATEX and the Machinery Directive

ATEX Wiki » Other Directives » ATEX and the Machinery Directive

ATEX and the Machinery Directive

Many products intended for use in explosive atmospheres also fall under the Machinery Directive (2006/42/EC). Understanding how these two directives interact prevents compliance gaps and avoids wasted effort. The key principle is straightforward: when both apply, manufacturers must satisfy both sets of requirements—but they complement rather than duplicate each other.

When Both Directives Apply

If a machine is intended for use in potentially explosive atmospheres, it must comply with both the ATEX Equipment Directive (2014/34/EU) and the Machinery Directive. The EC ATEX Guidelines (§233) explain that the directives are designed to work together: ATEX covers the specific hazard of explosion, while the Machinery Directive covers broader machinery safety requirements like mechanical hazards, stability, ergonomics, and noise.

Typical examples include pumps and compressors handling flammable fluids, conveyors in dusty environments (grain handling, powder processing), packaging machinery working with flammable products, mixing and blending equipment for combustible powders, and fans or ventilation equipment in classified areas. All of these are machines that may operate where explosive atmospheres exist.

How the Directives Complement Each Other

In practice, the division of responsibilities is logical:

From ATEX: Explosion protection requirements—how the equipment prevents ignition, which zones it's suitable for, temperature classification, and protection type
From the Machinery Directive: General mechanical safety—guards, emergency stops, stability, safe access, ergonomics, noise, vibration, and safe maintenance procedures

You don't assess the same hazard twice under different rules. Explosion risks are assessed under ATEX; mechanical risks under the Machinery Directive. But the design must address both simultaneously, and the technical file must demonstrate compliance with both.

Conformity Assessment

Each directive has its own conformity assessment requirements. For ATEX, the procedure depends on the equipment category. For the Machinery Directive, it depends on whether the machine appears in Annex IV (which lists higher-risk machinery requiring additional scrutiny). A notified body under one directive may or may not be notified under the other, so manufacturers need to check.

Single Declaration, Combined Documentation

The EU Declaration of Conformity can address both directives in a single document—listing both 2014/34/EU and 2006/42/EC, together with the relevant conformity assessment procedures completed for each. You don't need separate declarations.

Technical files for both directives can also be combined into one documentation package. This makes sense since much of the content overlaps: design drawings, specifications, test reports, risk assessments. The key is ensuring every requirement from both directives is covered. The documentation must demonstrate how the ATEX essential health and safety requirements (Annex II of 2014/34/EU) are met alongside the Machinery Directive's essential requirements (Annex I of 2006/42/EC).

Using Harmonised Standards

Some harmonised standards are recognised under both directives—for example, standards for explosion-protected electrical motors address both ATEX protection concepts and general motor safety. Using such standards creates presumption of conformity with the relevant requirements of both directives simultaneously, simplifying the process significantly.

Non-Electrical Equipment Overlap

Non-electrical equipment often involves the greatest overlap between ATEX and the Machinery Directive. A pump intended for flammable liquids has ATEX requirements for preventing mechanical sparks and controlling surface temperatures, plus Machinery Directive requirements for guarding, pressure containment, and safe operation. The manufacturer addresses both through integrated design—the same bearing choice might satisfy both the ATEX temperature requirement and the Machinery Directive's reliability requirement.

Practical Tip

When designing equipment that falls under both directives, address ATEX requirements early in the design process rather than trying to retrofit explosion protection onto a finished machine. ATEX requirements often drive fundamental design decisions—materials, clearances, sealing concepts—that are expensive to change later. Starting with an integrated approach saves time, money, and certification headaches.